RSS icon Email icon Bullet (black)
  • Repeal the 17th Amendment

    Posted on December 19th, 2011 King Allan No comments

    The Senate is bound to the constitution.
    The House follows the will of the people.

    If both houses react to the will of the people, what happens to the will of Constitution? Our elected representatives took an oath to uphold our constitution, not to buckle to the whim of special interest groups.  If not so, why does the legislative branch have two houses?

    Pre-Seventeenth Amendment Representatives were appointed to the Senate by their respective Governors, and when found neglecting the edicts of the Constitution they would quickly be in full discovery of the Governor’s boot… No election necessary! And the beauty of this system is; when a Governor fails to perform his/her duties, a state impeachment is faster and easier than the Federal Impeachment Bureaucracy.

    How will big business, special interest groups, or anyone for that matter influence or persuade appointed Senators? Corrupter’s may bribe the House of Representatives, but when their bill doesn’t pass the constitutional test their efforts fail!

    It really was a better system. The only reason they changed it was because the Constitution bound and prohibited the Marxist Progressive’s massive expansion of government. REF: The Naked Communists by Cleon Skousen

    We as a nation have wondered so far from the intent of the framers, that our rights are reduced to statutory code, massive regulations and a little’ole Police State to make sure things run their way.  Sovereign’s follow the laws. When a law offends our constitution, it’s time to change, repeal or expel such law. Repealing the 17th amendment is far overdue.

  • BNNreports.com

    Posted on December 1st, 2011 King Allan No comments

  • Fair Share Economics

    Posted on November 5th, 2011 King Allan No comments

    One for you, and one, two for me. Two for you, and one-two-three for me. That money con-game was so brilliantly performed by the Three Stooges in 1938 that Moe had to use some pretty slick counting dividing-up the Stooges cash stash. Little did Larry and Curly know that Moe was simply following our current day government accounting philosophies.

    A new philosophy used more in the Obama administration than any other before is the term “Fair Share.” In one speech he used the term 37 times. It made me wonder just what is a “Fare Share.” The media writes it as “Fair” but I think Obama’s teleprompter displays “Fare.” Personally I like the “Fare Share” edict because it’s simple and to the point… Everyone with “skin-in-the-game” pays an equally divided part of the total share.

    My math teacher might say, if four friends rent a four bedroom house at $400 per month, how much money does each person owe when the landlord comes to collect the rent? Back then a hundred bucks each was a fair share because back-then we viewed ourselves as individuals. Four rooms, four guys, $100 X 4 = rent.

    Operating under the graduated monetary principles of Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels, we may view my teachers math problem as: Renter-1 earns $50,000 per year, Renter-2 earns $35,000 per year, renter-3 earns 25,000 per year and renter-4 is on social assistance, receiving $7,200 per year. What formula would you use to insure each renter pays a “fair share” based on their income when the landlord comes to collect the rent?

    I thought you might want to know the answer, because I was curious too. In the fare share model each individual paid $100. In the “Fair Share” scenario monthly Renter-1 pays $310.56; Renter-2 $89.44; Renter-3 and Renter-4’s incomes are below the average income and pay nothing.

    This is considered “fair” by today’s socialists standards. And why not? Socialist views rank according to groups not individuals. The only mathematical formula which would result in rent payments based on income, started with the average income of the group.

    What exactly is “fair share” anyway?

    “Fair” can be used as a noun, verb, an adjective or an adverb but the common use definition is: free from bias, dishonesty, or injustice: a fair decision; a fair judge.

    Are we created fair or equal? “Fair” is the theme song of class envy. Fairness to whom though? Certainly not the nations bread winners or those paying the tab.

    How would the graduated payment method work if it were based on expenses instead of income? Imagine you are on your way to the checkout counter at your local Walmart. When you get there you see four lines. A flashing sign over checkout line one says “$0.00 – $12,500″; the next one flashes “$12,501 – $29,500; the third one shows “$29,501 – $49,500″; and the last one… “$49,501 and up.” Your income determines which checkout line you use.

    Using the graduated payment system, a $2,600 HDTV purchased in line one cost the high income buyer $7,800; line three buyers pay $2,600; and as before line 1 and 2 occupants pay nothing.

    According to our President the so called “Fortunate” among us must pay their “Fair Share.” Notice he doesn’t say “Equal Share.” That’s because Obama’s mindset believes we are all created fair, not equal. President Obama… The first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence clearly states we are Americans, not Marxists! Get with the program dude!

    © COPYRIGHT 2011 KINGALLANSHOW.COM AND ALLAN MASON, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PER UCC 1.207 WITHOUT PREJUDICE

    Should the government be equal or fair?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

  • Straw Polls

    Posted on August 15th, 2011 King Allan No comments

    Did you query the search engines for Iowa’s straw poll statistics only to find it’s almost as accurate as a coin toss? Yeah, me too. So what does that tell us? Did we learn anything here? Not to do it again? Nah!

    If Iowa’s straw poll results sets precedence for the other 57 states, Iowa being 58th… I think that’s what Obama said, well if Iowa’s straw poll actually set said precedence, then why would we have a national election? Everyone else in the country will have to accept Iowa’s choice because it’s fair.

    On the other hand, it could be fun, interesting and an excellent bragging rights platform… Maybe? One thing for sure, Iowa’s straw poll is great for the winners and their supporters.

    Imagine being stuck in the straw poll over and over, like the movie Groundhog Day. You can’t get out until your selected candidate falls in love with you. Ouch!

    Who would you vote for in the King Allan Straw Poll?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

  • So Much For Community Organizing

    Posted on July 26th, 2011 King Allan No comments

    WASHINGTON DC — President Obama’s Monday night debt speech sounded like a guy begging for a battery jump on a lonely road, in the middle of the night. Welcome to the “I’m broke” club Mr. President.  It’s your policies and bad decision making that got us in this mess, now you want more money… Just like a kid playing an arcade game begging his father for just one more quarter.

    And blaming George W. Bush makes you look like a kid in a school yard fight, pointing your finger at the other kid. Your community organizing may have worked well with those less fortunate, but your playing in a capitalist ballpark now. You see prez… It’s about the money! You’re looking for the magic credit card, similar to the one connected to all those government grants you used to receive.

    The debt ceiling has been breached. The American tax payer has had enough, and hopefully you have taken your last swipe. Grow up sir. By the way… We don’t care how many times the debt ceiling has been raised, it can’t be raised anymore than it is. Too bad for you that it happened under your watch big guy… Suck it up.

  • Obama Blames Republicans?

    Posted on July 25th, 2011 King Allan No comments

    Written by: Charlie Reese

    Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them. Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, we have deficits? Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, we have inflation and high taxes?

    You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The president does. You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does. You and I don’t write the tax code. Congress does. You and I don’t set fiscal policy. Congress does. You and I don’t control monetary policy. The Federal Reserve Bank does.

    One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president and nine Supreme Court justices – 545 human beings out of the 300 million – are directly, legally, morally and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country. I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered but private central bank.

    I excluded all but the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it.

    No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislation’s responsibility to determine how he votes.

    A CONFIDENCE CONSPIRACY | SCAM REVEALED

    Don’t you see how the con game that is played on the people by the politicians? Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party. What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of the SPEAKER, who stood up and criticized GEORGE BUSH for creating deficits.

    The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it. The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating appropriations and taxes. Nancy Pelosi is the speaker of the House. SHe is the leader of the majority party. SHe and her fellow Democrats, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetos it, they can pass it over his veto.

    REPLACE THE DIRTY ROTTEN SCOUNDRELS

    It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts – of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem, from an unfair tax code to defense overruns, that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

    If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair. If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red. If the Marines are in the MIDDLE EAST, it’s because they want them in the MIDDLE EAST. There are no insoluble government problems. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take it.

    Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exist disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do. Those 545 people and they alone are responsible. They and they alone have the power. They and they alone should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses – provided they have the gumption to manage their own employees.

  • Repeal the 16th Amendment

    Posted on July 20th, 2011 King Allan No comments

    “Reset the Debt.” Debt ceilings, GNP and economic uncertainties are all directly linked to the passage of our constitutions sixteenth amendment. Congress knew very well the Federal Reserve would run the printing press for as long as Congress asked them to do so. It’s as if your Master Card has no credit limit, and you can make your payments using the same credit card. Simply put, spend all your want and you don’t have to pay any of it back. Who wouldn’t vote for that?

    Problem is, the Fed wants money too. So every time Congress asks the Fed for money, they print a little extra for themselves… It’s called interest on the debt.

    The 16th amendment is the only reason Fanny Mae and Freddy Mack exists, and look what they turned into. The 16th amendment destroyed the gold standard, and lunged our nation in to debt. The 16th and 17th amendments are destroying our Republic and this bad dream needs to be stopped now! Therefore, King Allan suggests we hit the reset button! The fairest way to end this mess is to void any and all contracts, agreements, deeds and debts connected with Federal Reserve notes, certificates or demands.

    From the reset point forward all past debt is null and void. Your mortgage, car payments, credit card payments and all outstanding loans are “Paid in full.”

    Should we abolish the Federal Reserve?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

  • America’s Police State

    Posted on July 17th, 2011 King Allan No comments

    In 1962 my high school teachers actually taught Civics. For those who don’t know what Civics entails, it’s American History with special emphasis on the Constitution and how Government functions.

    Teachers also educated us about the perils of communism and most importantly about the necessity of a Police State to keep their communist agenda moving in the predefined direction, crushing the natural grain of the individual.

    To understand how the Marxist agenda works, you first must educate yourself using unaltered or untainted historical information. There are only a few documents capable of providing such knowledge. The Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution and the Communist Manifesto. NOTE: There are four or five translated versions of the Communist Manifesto on the Internet; I have read four of them and believe the provided version is the easiest to understand. Click here to download.

    In order to prove my argument, consider this scenario: During a routine traffic stop, for what ever the reason a Law Enforcement officer asks you to step out of your vehicle. You ask why. The police officer pulls a small packet from his or her pocket and says, “you are under arrest for possession of cocaine.” No matter how insane that sounds, more than not you will be handcuffed and hauled off to face a judge.

    Your only defense is, “that’s not mine… The officer pulled that out of his or her pocket.” Have you ever heard of anyone beating a drug charge with that testimony? The charge doesn’t matter, drugs or murder your word carries no weight against the law enforcement officer in the courtroom. Evidence maybe, but who’s in charge of the evidence? That’s right… The police.

    The other argument is, this never happens! The fact that it can happen is the point.

    A solution is simple, no evidence is admissible until a third party is on site before any search is conducted. That solves the probable cause clause, and keeps everyone on the level. The other question raised is, why isn’t the officer searched before he or she conducts a search? They don’t trust us, why should we trust them?

    Of course the constitutional solution is to legalize drugs, but we all know how society feels about that. It’s so sad that it has come to this.

    Do you believe America is a Police State?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

  • Good Deed Gone Bad

    Posted on July 13th, 2011 King Allan No comments

    When Christian Lopez, a 23-year-old mobile-phone salesman caught Derek Jeters home run ball then returned it as a good faith jester, little did he know some meddling news reporters would red flag the IRS to his newly received wealth. Now the government wants their piece of the pie too.

    The Yankees gave Lopez season seats, signed memorabilia and other gifts of considerable value and the IRS considers that income. It’s a far stretch said Rush Libmbaugh, conservative talk show host and King Allan agrees, but the IRS is used to having it their way; they write the tax code; and they have all the guns.

    Enjoy your gifts Mr. Lopez… You paid for them.

    Should the IRS tax the value of Gifts?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

  • We Don’t Need No Stink’n Borders

    Posted on July 12th, 2011 King Allan No comments

    We have been taught that wars and battles have “Rules of Engagement.” During the revolutionary war British Commanders constantly complained about American Patriots not fighting fairly, “They hide in trees and shoot from the cover of rocks.”  The Brits wanted to duke it out in open field hand-to-hand combat. Revolutionaries changed the rules of engagement so radically that the Kings army could not adjust tactics quick enough, thus they lost the war.

    So goes our neighbors from south of the Rio Grand. They know their battle tactics do the most harm when applied from within, so they use our freedoms and liberties to advance an agenda. Over the last couple of decades the Mexican government has encouraged their citizenry to jump our borders and setup shop in the US; To take full advantage of our educational system, hospitals and public assistance programs… Not excluding law enforcement, ICE and the DEA; ergo to place burden on our system.

    The Department of Homeland Security estimates more than 19 million illegal immigrants reside within U.S. borders. Mexican Drug cartels control most border towns and our military is stretched to the point of useless.

    The number one rule of engagement is… There are no rules! The most amazing achievement is how our attackers convinced us they have a right to be here; they have a right to a land that they claim was once theirs; after all… We took it from the Native Indians. At the end of it all rests the race card. Because conservatives reject losing their land and property they are racists.

    The battle approach has changed from all out blazing war to we’re slowly moving in, and when enough of us are here… We’ll take over.

    If a Republican is a Liberal who hasn’t been mugged yet, then a Libertarian is a Republican who is awake. Seek the light, capture the moment and pursue.

    Should we build Military Bases along the Border?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

  • Is Herman Cain able?

    Posted on July 2nd, 2011 King Allan No comments

    “You don’t drive a big fat car… You don’t look like a movie star and your money you won’t get far. But Baby yeah yeah… You got what it takes” might be the perfect theme song for Republican Presidential candidate Herman Cain. His appearance on Fox News Channel’s Sean Hannity Show was an opportunity for Cain to show a national audience he does have what it takes.

    When asked about his lack of foreign policy expertise Cain responded… Look at the mess we are in now because of “experienced politicians.” He went on to say leaders listen and ask the right questions, and that’s what made him a success at Pillsbury, Burger King and Godfathers Pizza.

    According to Herman Cain, his platform is simplistic, coupled with common-sense. He favors a consumption tax; no capital gains tax; abolishing the IRS; and cleaning up healthcare.

    Marv Johnson made “You Got What It Takes” a hit in 1960, but  the question today is… Does Herman Cain have what it takes to set my soul on fire in November 2012?

    Would you vote for Herman Cain in 2012?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

  • Rally Planned at Houston National Cemetery on July 4th

    Posted on July 1st, 2011 RealetyBytes No comments

    Houston, TX – A coalition of pastors from the Greater Houston area, representing a broad ethnic and denominational spectrum, announced an event on the 4th of July, which will call for the removal of the Director of Houston’s National Cemetery Arleen Ocasio.

    Ocasio ignited controversy prior to Memorial Day by attempting to censor a pastor’s prayer, and has issued a general policy prohibiting reference to God or Jesus, as well as other prohibitions of religious expression at the cemetery.

    Army Special Forces veteran Pastor Willie Davis, stated on behalf of the Houston Area Pastor Council, that Ocasio’s actions are offensive, and should result in her termination. “We concur wholeheartedly with Congressman Ted Poe’s call for her dismissal, for these egregious attacks on the sacred right of expressing religious faith on the hallowed ground of our National Cemetery, on behalf of those who died to protect that right,” Pastor Davis declared. He went on to say “There can be no better way to spend a few minutes on Independence Day, than to stand together as a community at the National Cemetery, and make our voices heard.”

    The Department of Veterans Affairs said on Thursday, that invoking the name of God or Jesus is not only allowed, but common at VA National Cemeteries across the country. While this appears to be an isolated case, concerned veterans want to make sure this policy doesn’t spread to other National Cemeteries.

    Republican Presidential candidate and U. S. Army Veteran, Mike Manley, who is scheduling a similar event in Florida, said, “As veterans we must stand together on this issue. As Americans, we protect our first amendment rights, and realize we are one nation under God.”

    Manley believes veteran affairs are directly related to national security, and affects recruitment enlistment, troupe retention, and the overall morale of our military forces.

    In the words of George Washington:

    “The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive veterans of early wars were treated and appreciated by our nation.”

    Should Aeleen Ocasio be removed from office?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

  • Houston National Cemetery Bans GOD

    Posted on June 30th, 2011 King Allan No comments

    The American Legion, Veterans of Foreign Wars and the National Memorial Ladies all complain of “religious hostility” at the cemetery. Their 26-page complaint alleges that the cemetery’s director, Arleen Ocasio, bans religious phrases and requires prayers to be submitted in advance for her approval.

    “However, the new allegations come one month after a controversy surrounding Pastor Scott Rainey’s prayer in Jesus’ name at a Memorial Day service in the cemetery. U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes ruled May 26 that the government couldn’t stop Rainey from using the words “Jesus Christ” in his invocation. Hughes issued a temporary restraining order to prevent the Department of Veterans Affairs from censoring Rainey’s prayer.”

    Republican Presidential candidate Mike Manley, a strong supporter of veteran affairs says, “This is a direct assault of our first amendment rights, and my administration will not stand for such tyranny.”

  • Who Is Mike Manley?

    Posted on June 29th, 2011 King Allan No comments

    When Jimmy Carter announced is bid for the presidency in 1974 the main stream media said, Jimmy who? It wasn’t long before Jimmy Carter was a household name and in 1976 he was elected president of the United States.

    Today successful businessman and recipient of the Senatorial Medal of Freedom, Mike Manley joins the presidential race, and the main stream media is starting to ask questions. Mike Manley may very well be a household name during the next 17 months, and then history as it has before may repeat itself.

    Manley says his campaign is based in people and patriotism. He believes in America first and the edicts of our constitution. “America is off track” says Manley, and he believes he is the one to fix our ills.

    Manley is a healthcare specialist, and says removing fraud and abuse from the medical system will cut the cost of healthcare by 45 percent. He believes drilling for oil on U.S. soil should be a public profit sharing program that will bring pump prices to a dollar per gallon. Plus drilling in the U.S. will force unemployment numbers below 5 percent.

    Manley says building military bases along our borders will stop the flow of illegal immigrants, secure our liberties and save billions in social program budgets.

    For more information about Mike Manley: www.manleymanforpresident.com

  • Supreme Court Rules Violent Video Games Protected

    Posted on June 27th, 2011 King Allan No comments

    In a 7 to 2 decision the Supreme Court rules a minors right to purchase or rent violent video games is protected by the first amendment.

    “Today, the Supreme Court affirmed what we have always known; that free speech protections apply every bit as much to video games as they do to other forms of creative expression like books, movies and music,” said Michael D. Gallagher, ESA’s president and CEO of the ESA, in a statement. ” The Court declared forcefully that content-based restrictions on games are unconstitutional; and that parents, not government bureaucrats, have the right to decide what is appropriate for their children.” Justice Thomas and Breyer dissented saying the court read something into the first amendment that just isn’t there.

    The court believes that parents should decide what their children can and can not do when it comes to such matters. After all, they are minors. King Allan says “I hope Child Protection Agencies comply to the ruling.”